Wealth redistribution pros and cons
I have to give a presentation over the problems of income redistribution. The question I need to answer is does our changing work ethic and the desire fo the government to provide all our needs contribute to our current problem? I have found a few websites with some decent information regarding income. show more I have to give a presentation over.
Best Answer: The best data series I could find is for Argentina. In the 1940s, the top 1 percent there controlled more than 20 percent of incomes. That was roughly double the share at that time in the United States. Since then, we’ve reversed places. The share controlled by the top 1 percent in Argentina has fallen to a bit more than 15 percent.
When you eliminate any motivation to work hard, take risks or innovate you are killing off any human advancement. and everybody ends up worse off. There have already been 2 major redistribution s of wealth in America. The first in the early 1900 s when unions helped to form the middle-class,osha etc by demanding fair wages, hours, and safe work.
Redistribution of wealth is simply the transfer of wealth, property or income from one individual to another. This redistribution is caused by some social mechanism, such as nationalization, charity, taxation, welfare or tort law. Typically the redistribution is progressive, referring to a transfer of wealth from the rich to the poor.
In these times of bailouts and corporate corruption and growing inequality of wealth we hear a lot from the left about wealth redistribution, laws to set ratios between the salaries of workers and CEOs and other ideas to try to force an economic egalitarianism on the free market as the expression of a socialistic ideal of economic class warfare. It.
Usually, when you hear a Republican say the words Redistribution of Wealth, the speaker gets this look on their face like they just had a little acid reflux moment. They say the words, Redistribution of Wealth, they burp up some stomach acids into the mouth, there is a burning, followed by a gag reflex, the face contorts, and the speaker is a.
Readers Question: ‘Society may come to the view that too much inequality is unacceptable or undesirable’ Assess whether inequality can cause economic problems, such as market failure. What are the advantages and disadvantages of inequality? Inequality means there is a gap between the highest income earners and the lowest income earners. (inequality.
More information about universal life insurance including pros and cons, basic definition, and policy features such as flexible death benefit and premium, and cash. wealthmanagement.com/forums/rias-independents/pros-and-cons-ria jwcopper wrote:What are some of the pros and cons of the following: Being an IAR under an RIA at a firm such as LPL.
It means people who don t produce anything are guaranteed they can still consume something. It means our most productive people can stop working when they ve reached their personal limit of how much they may consume for themselves. It means people are less free. Depending on what your ideology happens to be, it would be a different answer. If.